Patient Risk Perception and Decision-Making about Adherence to Repeat Cancer Scr
Project Number1I01HX003242-01A2
Former Number1I01HX003242-01A1
Contact PI/Project LeaderGILLESPIE, CHRISTOPHER
Awardee OrganizationEDITH NOURSE ROGERS MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL
Description
Abstract Text
Background: VA seeks to promote patient-centered care in which Veterans' personal values and goals drive
health care plans. Involving patients in their care can produce better health outcomes. We currently have little
understanding of how Veterans make decisions about returning for repeat screening, including how results of
prior screening tests affect their risk perceptions, and how other sources of information influence adherence
decisions. The Knowledge-Empowerment-Values and Health Belief models have been applied to decisions
about screening uptake. This study will extend that model to account for repeat screening decisions.
Significance: Patients' decisions to engage in routine screening and return for repeat screening are at the
core of the success or failure of VA initiatives to improve screening. Using breast cancer screening (BCS) and
lung cancer screening (LCS) as cases, this work will generate greater understanding of how perceptions of risk
change throughout the screening process. We will develop patient-driven materials for information that can
given to patients prior to screening, as well as included in the reporting of screening results, that can inform
communication between providers and patients decision-making that is Veteran-centered. These findings will
also be able to be extended beyond lung and breast cancer screening to other cancer screening programs.
Innovation and Impact: This study is unique in that we will be using multiple programs of cancer screening
as cases to understand repeat screening decision-making. Lung cancer and breast cancer screening are
cases with important similarities and differences that offer opportunities to more fully examine the many factors
that Veterans consider when deciding to return, or not, for repeat screening. In doing so, we will develop a
broader understanding of how Veterans engage with the screening process and how perceptions of risk
change throughout this process. This may also inform the implementation of shared decision-making and
patient-centered care in screening programs for other conditions that involve repeated routine screenings.
Specific Aims: Aim 1-Characterize elements that influence patients' decisions about repeat cancer screening.
Aim 1a – Ascertain how veterans who are undergoing lung and breast cancer screening interpret the
results of screening exams, revise their perceptions of risk, and make decisions about repeat LCS and BCS.
Aim 1b – Identify factors that influence how Veterans make decisions about repeat cancer screening.
The focus will be on determining the variety of sources of information Veterans have utilized as they refine their
perceptions of risk and vulnerability, and an evaluation of the styles and formats they feel would be useful.
Aim 2 – Contrast the perceptions of risk and the screening experiences of Veterans undergoing lung and
breast cancer screening to specify a model of decision-making in repeat cancer screening.
Aim 3 – Develop patient-driven materials and that will optimize patient-centered decisions about repeat cancer
screening.
Methodology: This is a longitudinal qualitative study of Veterans' decisions about returning for repeat
screening for LCS and BCS. The study is designed to optimize informative comparisons between LCS and
BCS toward the development of a generalized understanding of repeat cancer screening decision-making. We
will interview 35 Veterans who have initiated LCS and 35 Women Veterans who have initiated BCS. We will
attempt to interview participants at 3 time points: 1) before initial screening, 2) shortly after initial screening,
and 3) after recommended repeat screening (annual, or surveillance). We will compare and contrast these
experiences to inform development of a conceptual model of repeat cancer screening decision-making.
Next Steps/Implementation: We will work with an expert panel to develop patient-centered materials to
assist Veterans in making decisions about repeat cancer screening. Our operational partners will assist with
disseminating materials to patients and providers through messaging campaigns and other outreach efforts.
Public Health Relevance Statement
VA seeks to promote patient-centered care in which Veterans' personal values, goals, and preferences drive
health care plans. Cancer screening often involves a complex process whereby patients who do not exhibit
any symptoms participate in repeated testing over sometimes inconsistent intervals over many years. Clinical
recommendations do not account for variation in these perceptions over the course of cancer screening, and
little is known about how they change over time and between screening intervals. Using lung and breast
cancer screening initiatives as cases, this work will generate greater understanding of how perceptions of risk
change throughout the screening process. We will develop guidance and materials for patients and providers
to facilitate patient-centered shared decision-making in repeat cancer screening.
NIH Spending Category
No NIH Spending Category available.
Project Terms
AdherenceAffectAgeAreaBenefits and RisksBiopsyBreast Cancer DetectionCaringClinicalCollaborationsCommunicationComplexDataDecision MakingDevelopmentElementsEligibility DeterminationEvaluationFailureFamilyFocus GroupsFrequenciesGoalsHealthHealth PromotionHealthcareImageInterviewKnowledgeMalignant NeoplasmsMalignant neoplasm of lungMethodologyModelingOncologyOutcomeParticipantPatient riskPatient-Centered CarePatientsPerceptionPreventiveProcessProviderQualitative ResearchRecommendationRecording of previous eventsReportingResearchRiskRisk FactorsScreening ResultScreening for cancerSourceSymptomsTestingTimeTo specifyTobacco useUncertaintyVariantVeteransWomanWorkcancer riskcompliance behaviordesigndisorder preventionempoweredempowermentexperiencefollow-uphealth beliefimprovedinnovationinsightlung cancer screeningmalignant breast neoplasmoutreachpatient orientedpreferenceprocess repeatabilityprogramsrisk perceptionroutine screeningscreeningscreening programshared decision makingsuccessuptake
No Sub Projects information available for 1I01HX003242-01A2
Publications
Publications are associated with projects, but cannot be identified with any particular year of the project or fiscal year of funding. This is due to the continuous and cumulative nature of knowledge generation across the life of a project and the sometimes long and variable publishing timeline. Similarly, for multi-component projects, publications are associated with the parent core project and not with individual sub-projects.
No Publications available for 1I01HX003242-01A2
Patents
No Patents information available for 1I01HX003242-01A2
Outcomes
The Project Outcomes shown here are displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health. NIH has not endorsed the content below.
No Outcomes available for 1I01HX003242-01A2
Clinical Studies
No Clinical Studies information available for 1I01HX003242-01A2
News and More
Related News Releases
No news release information available for 1I01HX003242-01A2
History
No Historical information available for 1I01HX003242-01A2
Similar Projects
No Similar Projects information available for 1I01HX003242-01A2