Awardee OrganizationSLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH
Description
Abstract Text
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Numerous studies have appeared in the cancer literature in the past few years linking hospital and surgeon procedure volume with patient outcomes. Results from these studies have direct policy implications, since regionalization is a considered strategy to improve the quality and efficiency of many different types of health care. Evaluation of an association between hospital or surgeon procedure volume and patient outcomes involves complex statistical issues that arise from the fact that the unit of observation is the patient, but these studies include multiple patients per hospital or surgeon as well as multiple hospitals or surgeons. Hence, patient outcomes tend to be correlated within hospitals or within surgeons, i.e., patients treated at the same hospital or by the same surgeon, may be more likely to experience similar outcomes than patients treated by a hospital or surgeon with the same volume. This phenomenon is referred to as "clustering" of outcomes, in the presence of clustering, standard statistical methods that assume patient outcomes are independent, are invalid. The general goal of this proposal is to critically examine the validity of widely-available statistical techniques that have been used in the context of volume-outcome studies such as generalized estimating equations and random effects models. The volume-outcome setting is unique in that "volume" reflects both the primary factor under study and also the cluster size, a fact that may well invalidate assumptions inherent in the use of available methods that correct for clustering. Simultaneous evaluation of the effects of hospital volume and surgeon volume is also hampered by the fact that the data are cress-classified, i.e., individual surgeons will perform surgeries at several hospitals. Through a detailed simulation study, the statistical validity of available statistical techniques in this context will be critically evaluated. Our methodological research will heighten awareness of clustering in health policy studies. Upon completion of our research plan, we will make recommendations about various analytic strategies for clustered binary data.
Public Health Relevance Statement
Data not available.
NIH Spending Category
No NIH Spending Category available.
Project Terms
behavioral /social science research tagclinical researchdata collection methodology /evaluationhealth care personnel performancehealth care qualityhealth care service evaluationhealth science researchhealth science research analysis /evaluationhealth services research taghospital utilizationhospitalshuman datahuman population studyoutcomes researchstatistics /biometry
No Sub Projects information available for 5R21CA107439-02
Publications
Publications are associated with projects, but cannot be identified with any particular year of the project or fiscal year of funding. This is due to the continuous and cumulative nature of knowledge generation across the life of a project and the sometimes long and variable publishing timeline. Similarly, for multi-component projects, publications are associated with the parent core project and not with individual sub-projects.
No Publications available for 5R21CA107439-02
Patents
No Patents information available for 5R21CA107439-02
Outcomes
The Project Outcomes shown here are displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health. NIH has not endorsed the content below.
No Outcomes available for 5R21CA107439-02
Clinical Studies
No Clinical Studies information available for 5R21CA107439-02
News and More
Related News Releases
No news release information available for 5R21CA107439-02
History
No Historical information available for 5R21CA107439-02
Similar Projects
No Similar Projects information available for 5R21CA107439-02