Improving Medication Safety through Human Factors and Informatics Research
Project Number1IK2HX000856-01A1
Contact PI/Project LeaderRUSS-JARA, ALISSA LYNN
Awardee OrganizationRLR VA MEDICAL CENTER
Description
Abstract Text
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant):
Background/Rationale: According to the Institute of Medicine, over 1 million preventable adverse drug events (ADEs) occur in the U.S. each year. To reduce the risk of patient harm, the VA's computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system includes automated medication alerts, such as drug-drug interaction alerts, to warn prescribers about potential problems. Unfortunately, compelling evidence indicates that VA alerts do not provide sufficient information to assist prescribers as they make decisions while ordering medications. Alert design can be informed by human factors research; human factors engineers focus on how to design technologies, processes, and work systems to match inherent human capabilities and limitations. Objectives The research objective of this career development award (CDA-2) is to assess the strengths and weaknesses of VA alert designs compared to other systems and identify strategies to enhance VA medication alerts for clinical decision-making. The specific aims are as follows: Aim 1: Identify the cognitive strategies that prescribers use for medication decision-making when faced with medication alerts, to provide evidence on how to improve alert design. Aim 2: Develop and test new strategies for alert content and display that aid decision- making at the earliest possible stage of the order process, in order to promote safer
prescribing decisions. Aim 3: Evaluate whether the promising new alert design improves medication management. Each of these aims incorporate human factors techniques. There are few human factors researchers in VA; this CDA-2 experience will prepare the candidate to become an independent VA human factors researcher, with specialized expertise in information technologies for prescribing, medication management, and patient safety. Methods For Aim 1, cognitive task analysis, including critical decision method and simulation interviews, will be conducted with prescribers to uncover their decision-making process for drug-allergy alerts, drug-drug interaction alerts, and drug-disease alerts. For Aim 2, two new alert designs will be developed and evaluated to assess which design most effectively supports prescriber comprehension, since this is essential to support decision-making. Finally, for Aim 3, a simulation study will be conducted with prescribers to compare the new alert design against the VA CPOE system to assess whether the redesign improves clinical decision-making outcomes. As part of Aim 3, we will also test the feasibility of implementing design changes and collecting clinical outcomes at one VAMC. Significance This CDA-2 research will identify VA alert design strategies to better support clinical decision- making. This research is essential to reduce preventable harm and advance VA health information technology for the future.
Public Health Relevance Statement
The VA's computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system is used by VA prescribers nationwide and includes automated medication alerts, which are intended to prevent medication errors during order entry. This research will help the VA understand how to better integrate medication alerts into patient care and improve alert designs for prescriber decision-making and patient safety. Findings will be shared with local and national VA informatics and patient safety leaders. This research will provide a foundation for developing design guidelines for the medication alert interface and may ultimately be used to improve medication safety for veterans.
NIH Spending Category
No NIH Spending Category available.
Project Terms
Biomedical EngineeringBypassClinicalClinical PharmacistsCognitiveComprehensionConsultDataDecision MakingDiseaseDrug HypersensitivityDrug InteractionsEducationElectronic Health RecordEngineeringEventFatigueFoundationsFutureGuidelinesHealthcareHumanInformaticsInformation TechnologyInstitute of Medicine (U.S.)InterviewK-Series Research Career ProgramsMedication ErrorsMedication ManagementMethodsOutcomePatient CarePatientsPharmaceutical PreparationsProcessProviderPublic Health InformaticsReportingResearchResearch MethodologyResearch PersonnelRiskSafetyStagingSystemTechniquesTechnologyTestingTimeTrainingVeteransWorkWorkloadcareerclinical decision-makingcomputerizeddesignengineering designexperiencehealth information technologyimprovedpatient safetypreventpublic health relevancesimulationskillstask analysis
No Sub Projects information available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1
Publications
Publications are associated with projects, but cannot be identified with any particular year of the project or fiscal year of funding. This is due to the continuous and cumulative nature of knowledge generation across the life of a project and the sometimes long and variable publishing timeline. Similarly, for multi-component projects, publications are associated with the parent core project and not with individual sub-projects.
No Publications available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1
Patents
No Patents information available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1
Outcomes
The Project Outcomes shown here are displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health. NIH has not endorsed the content below.
No Outcomes available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1
Clinical Studies
No Clinical Studies information available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1
News and More
Related News Releases
No news release information available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1
History
No Historical information available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1
Similar Projects
No Similar Projects information available for 1IK2HX000856-01A1