Service Members often describe their worst military-based traumas as the confrontation with
unresolvable moral dilemmas that rattle their fundamental sense of self. Moral Injury is the debilitating
syndrome that indexes the psychiatric and functional impairment associated with these military-based
traumas. The objective of this study is to improve the measurement of the moral injury construct by
evaluating two moral injury event questionnaires (i.e., Moral Injury Events Scale [MIES]1 and Moral Injury
Questionnaire-Military Version [MIQM]2) and refining these instruments by creating new measures of
moral injury events and mechanisms using items from the MIES and MIQM. This study will conduct
secondary analysis on data from two longitudinal parent studies: a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Veterans Integrated Service Network 17 Center of Excellence (CoE) study of Iraq and Afghanistan War
Veterans (N = ~500) and a Department of Defense (DoD) Walter Army Institute of Research (WRAIR)
study of active duty Soldiers (N = ~800). Data on the MIES and MIQM, along with a set of theoretically
relevant predictors and outcomes, are being collected at two time points approximately eight months
apart in the Veteran and Soldier samples, and will be ready to analyze by spring 2017 and spring 2018
for the Soldier and Veteran samples, respectively. This objective will be accomplished by pursuing three
specific aims: 1) the occurrence of moral injury events and mechanisms will be assessed using item-
level analysis of the MIES and MIQM; 2) the dimensionality of the MIES, MIQM, and new refined
measures that disaggregate moral injury event and mechanism items on both measures will be tested
using expert review, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and graded response (item
response theory) analysis. The reliability and construct validity of the MIES, MIQM, and new measures
of moral injury events and mechanisms will be evaluated using correlational coefficients, multiple
regressions, and structural equation models. 3) Empirically driven recommendations for assessing moral
injury events and mechanisms will be developed and disseminated throughout the VA and DoD.
This Career Development Award -1 (CDA-1) will provide Dr. Frankfurt with the support needed to
move her towards her career goal of being an independent VA clinical research scientist with a focus in
military trauma-related sequelae including moral injury and aim to improve post-deployment
reintegration. To achieve this goal, Dr. Frankfurt’s training plan includes VA psychology leadership
training and professional development training. Specific training goals for the proposed CDA-1 include:
(1) Mentorship in psychometrics, assessment, and measurement construction; (2) Mentorship in
advanced interdisciplinary clinical and theoretical domains relevant to moral injury; and (3) Mentorship in
project administration, grantsmanship, and research in the VA and DoD, and how to conduct research in
these two different yet connected organizations. In addition to these training goals, Dr. Frankfurt also
aims to become a VA psychology leader to advocate for innovative, integrative evidence-based care.
Given her research and clinical background in the field of trauma psychology, this CDA-1 project is a
natural extension of her prior work. This project will continue her previous work on psychosocial
functioning and moral injury following combat trauma and extend it into the field of postdeployment
rehabilitation and recovery. This CDA-1 training plan includes mentorship from VA and DoD experts in
the fields of moral injury (Dr. Brett Litz), assessment (Dr. Michael Russell), survey and DoD research
(Dr. Lyndon Riviere), and non-VA expert in psychometrics (Dr. Brett Donnellan). This CDA-1 will also
provide mentored support for Dr. Frankfurt to prepare a Career Development Award-2 application for a
project to develop an evidence-based guide and trainings on treating moral injury for VA providers.
Public Health Relevance Statement
This CDA-1 project is expected to develop measures that can be used to identify the impact of moral
injury events on Veterans’ postdeployment rehabilitation and recovery. Moral injury is the harm that
results from actions Veterans did or did not take during service, and involves significant guilt, shame,
and rage. This project is expected to determine if moral injury events have a significant impact on
reintegration and, thus, whether moral injury needs to be addressed in the rehabilitation context. The
proposed study will evaluate and attempt to refine two existing measures of moral injury events and
provide empirically driven recommendations on moral injury assessment to VA providers. Fundamental
issues with moral injury measurement need to be remedied to move forward research on moral injury
interventions. For the VA researchers and providers, this project will contribute greatly to improving
recovery and reintegration by identifying moral injury as a potentially novel target of intervention.
NIH Spending Category
No NIH Spending Category available.
Project Terms
AddressAdvocateAfghanistanAtrocitiesAttentionBeliefCaringClinicalClinical ResearchCognitive DissonanceDataDepartment of DefenseDevelopmentDimensionsEquationEventEvidence based treatmentFactor AnalysisFrightFundingGoalsGuiltImpairmentInjuryInterventionIraqK-Series Research Career ProgramsLeadershipLongitudinal StudiesMeasurementMeasuresMentorsMentorshipMilitary PersonnelModelingMoralsOutcomeParentsPost-Traumatic Stress DisordersPreparationPropertyProviderPsychologyPsychometricsPublicationsQuestionnairesRageRecommendationRecoveryRehabilitation therapyResearchResearch InstituteResearch PersonnelRoleSamplingScientistServicesShameSoldierSuicideSurveysSyndromeTestingTimeTrainingTraumaVeteransWarWorkbasecareercombatevidence baseexperiencefunctional disabilityhandbookimprovedindexinginnovationinstrumentnoveloutcome predictionprogramspsychologicpsychosocialresearch studyresponsesecondary analysisservice memberstemtheoriestwo-dimensional
No Sub Projects information available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2
Publications
Publications are associated with projects, but cannot be identified with any particular year of the project or fiscal year of funding. This is due to the continuous and cumulative nature of knowledge generation across the life of a project and the sometimes long and variable publishing timeline. Similarly, for multi-component projects, publications are associated with the parent core project and not with individual sub-projects.
No Publications available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2
Patents
No Patents information available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2
Outcomes
The Project Outcomes shown here are displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health. NIH has not endorsed the content below.
No Outcomes available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2
Clinical Studies
No Clinical Studies information available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2
News and More
Related News Releases
No news release information available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2
History
No Historical information available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2
Similar Projects
No Similar Projects information available for 1IK1RX002427-01A2