Awardee OrganizationHARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Description
Abstract Text
As U.S. hospitals moved quickly to make plans and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, many struggled with
significant challenges in managing the crisis simultaneously with maintaining the health and safety of patients
and hospital staff. This event has demonstrated the need for hospitals to develop effective emergency
management (EM) programs to deal with the current crisis and future disaster events. Federal agencies and
others have published guidelines on hospital EM, but these guidelines frequently change, are sometimes
inconsistent, and do not describe the process for effectively managing emergencies and expected outcomes.
Consequently, hospitals have invoked a variety of EM practices in dealing with COVID-19, with varying impact.
The variation in EM is especially salient when comparing rural and urban hospitals, which not only differ in
terms of resources and the surge in COVID-19 cases, but rural hospitals are typically located in areas with a
larger high-risk population of patients with underlying conditions who can have greater complications if COVID-
19 is contracted. Therefore, it is critical to understand hospital EM in response to COVID-19 across both urban
and rural settings. Building on prior research, we hypothesize that successful EM programs have distinguishing
attributes. First, effective EM practices demonstrate elements of resilience, or capabilities to respond to
disruptive events with minimal negative impact to performance. Second, effective EM includes a mixture of
formal mechanisms such as standardized protocols and reporting structures, as well as informal mechanisms,
such as adaptive routines and flexible roles.
Our research examines the EM practices of 12 urban and rural hospitals to identify effective techniques and
processes that enabled these organizations to provide quality care and move toward resilience during and after
COVID-19. We will use qualitative and quantitative approaches to examine how the combination of EM
practices employed by hospitals contributed to resilience, improved health outcomes, and stronger hospital
performance overall. We first plan to conduct interviews with hospital executives and clinical leaders directly
involved in EM during COVID-19 so we can identify and compare EM practices across each of the study
hospitals using thematic analysis (Aim 1). Next, we will use the interview data in Aim 1 to design surveys which
we will administer to key personnel at each hospital. Using factor analysis, we will develop a validated scale to
assess the saliency of different EM practices, formal and informal mechanisms, and resilience (Aim 2). Last,
we will conduct complementary quantitative analyses to examine patient outcomes and hospital performance
in relation to the EM scales we developed in Aim 2, so that we can determine which practices and mechanisms
of implementing EM were most effective. From these findings we will identify core elements and benchmarks of
successful EM programs for broad dissemination (Aim 3). Through our research, we aim to provide hospitals
with evidence-based EM practices that will better equip them for the current crisis and future disasters.
Public Health Relevance Statement
PROJECT NARRATIVE
During the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. hospitals responded with a variety of emergency management (EM)
practices to deal with the disaster while simultaneously providing quality care to patients and a safe
environment for hospital staff. Through a mixed-method approach, this research analyzes how rural and urban
hospitals effectively employed EM practices to manage a disaster event, while providing quality care for all
hospitalized patients. Our findings will provide an evidence base for effective EM programs which can be used
during the current pandemic and in future disaster events.
No Sub Projects information available for 1R01HS028240-01
Publications
Publications are associated with projects, but cannot be identified with any particular year of the project or fiscal year of funding. This is due to the continuous and cumulative nature of knowledge generation across the life of a project and the sometimes long and variable publishing timeline. Similarly, for multi-component projects, publications are associated with the parent core project and not with individual sub-projects.
No Publications available for 1R01HS028240-01
Patents
No Patents information available for 1R01HS028240-01
Outcomes
The Project Outcomes shown here are displayed verbatim as submitted by the Principal Investigator (PI) for this award. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the PI and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institutes of Health. NIH has not endorsed the content below.
No Outcomes available for 1R01HS028240-01
Clinical Studies
No Clinical Studies information available for 1R01HS028240-01
News and More
Related News Releases
No news release information available for 1R01HS028240-01
History
No Historical information available for 1R01HS028240-01
Similar Projects
No Similar Projects information available for 1R01HS028240-01